Jojo Ruba, executive director at Faith Beyond Belief discusses the recent conversion therapy ban passed by Edmonton city council and what the ban will mean for Christian counselors and Christians in general.
At one point California Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson says, “We are using what my grammar teacher would have heart attack over. We are using the phrase they. My grammar teacher’s long gone. And I won’t be hearing from her. If any of you.” She says it almost in the context that with the death of her grammar teacher, so too dies the old way of speaking. As if here grammar was the arbiter of the truth of grammar.
This is an updated section from large “cumalative” case made on why RPT is against normalizing same-sex marriage.
➌ @ ODDS WITH THE CONSTITUTION
Same-sex marriage as pushed by liberals is in direct conflict to enumerated protections in the Constitution. In Massachusetts, and now it is happening in Illinois. The oldest (in the nation), most successful foster and adoption care organization has closed its doors because they would be forced to adopt to same-sex couples. Lets peer into who this would affect:
- “Everyone’s still reeling from the decision,” Marylou Sudders, executive director of the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (MSPCC), said yesterday. “Ultimately, the only losers are the kids,” said Maureen Flatley, a Boston adoption consultant and lobbyist. (more on RPT & WT)
Here is a RECENT story regarding Philadelphia and the harming of foster families and children for this cultural Marxist religion:
As you can see, these marriages hurt many heterosexual persons as well as children in finding families and are not just a “Live-And-Let-Live” scenario.
And “religion/religious institutions” are specifically protected via that founding document, the Constitution — gay marriage is not. Which is why many of the conservative gay men and women I know rejects the agenda by the Left in this push. There are other areas this affects the heterosexual, as do all “special rights” and not “equal rights.” But the above example should show this is not a neutral idea.
One example of this “non-neutrality” come from The Witherspoon Institute in their article title, “Same-Sex Marriage Ten Years On: Lessons from Canada.” In this article we read:
Now, the above examples do not have to be the case. Civil-unions can co-exist alongside marriage and religious institutions if the Left isn’t in control of the culture war. Which is also why many gay men and women stand arm-and-arm with people against same-sex marriage and exploitation or twisting of nature (the “genderless” agenda). Gay Patriot eruditely points out that it has been done, and when done correctly, can be a wonderful thing:
This understanding and firm stand against the progressive agenda is needed, especially from the gay community. One astute post on the matter points out that the views of what constitutes marriage within the LGBT community are varied and wide:
Which is why many gays are against this relation being celebrated as equal to that of the heterosexual underpinnings of society, see number six for some more examples.
(SNOPES says the above is mostly true, BTW)
“…so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark…” (Revelation 13:17[a]).
Comments via LiveLeak:
Larry Elder quickly touches on the story of Country Mill Farms in East Lansing, Michigan:
GAY PATRIOT notes this about the above:
The DAILY MAIL notes the transition from “he” or “she” to “ze”
The DAILY CALLER continues…
Yeh… so thoughtful to institute speech codes and thought codes… CONTINUING…
I previously discussed this “newsspeak” (for lack of a better word) in a previous post, recently updated as well with Michael Medved:
Gay Patriot notes the story, and ends with how leftist propaganda works:
Another story I wanted to highlight from Gay Patriot is this one… and it is GP merely stating a story… and repeating the fascistic point. And mind you… Dennis Prager is right when he quotes David Horowitz:
- Inside many liberals is a totalitarian screaming to get out
Here is Patriot’s excerpt plus a little more via The Federalist:
Remember, these are fascistic leftists that hate freedom… not all leftist or gays subscribe to this pattern. Better know who these freedom loving gays are and support them.
This is merely a lesbian caller with a conservative point of view, then an interview with North Carolina Governor, Pat McCrory. As is usual by the left… there are many false claims made about this bill… as well as fake hate-crimes regarding these issues (fake NC bathroom hate — fake cake hate), which is VERY common by the victim-mentality driving the left.
Gay Patriot notes the following “choosing” of laws that explains the inner workings of the direction of the left:
- Isn’t it interesting that the Obama Administration does absolutely nothing about ‘Sanctuary Cities’ that defy Federal Immigration laws, but they are coming down like a ton of bricks on North Carolina for requiring people to use biologically-appropriate bathrooms in state-owned buildings? (Contrary to the left’s dishonest propaganda, businesses may do as they please, under the law, which is as it should be)….
Fox News Sunday w/Governor Pat McCrory via Breitbart:
Larry Elder discusses the issue:
ESPN let’s everyone know, no one can hold differing views of those held by the left.
I have been saying as of late that in pre-war Germany, it wasn’t that a law was passed that immediately forbade Jews the freedom to interact in business (owning a business), society (respectful interactions with the community), commerce (the buying and selling with all people groups)… they were pushed out of these incrementally. Similarly, we are seeing the same thing happen here. Over a decade the Judeo-Christian view (the traditional Western view of marriage) is now considered bigoted. It is becoming impossible to own businesses in some states… and this view was “federalized” by the Court recently.
- It is becoming impossible to hold a job even if you merely have contributed to a political cause, such as the past CEO of Mozilla.
- Or own a business.
- Laws in New York are forcing people to even use the pronouns people wish to be called.
- And this is already leading to “re-education” camps.
Take note that while I agree with Larry 100% that ESPN has a right to fire whomever they wish, this thinking that is starting to pervade corporations and public life is an ethos similar to that of pre-war Germany, and should be called out as “fascistic” by those of us who love freedom.
I first saw this on The Blaze, here is the gist of the story:
Gay Patriot quotes the main story as well:
And POWER this is about, because you cannot have equality (as the left sees it) without an authoritarian government to make sure of it.
For the curious who missed a previous post/upload on this, here is the North Carolina law and misunderstanding of by the left and Democrats on this protection: