Climate Change Disrupted

These are links to some counter Anthropogenic [man-caused] Global Warming (AGW). In the pictures are links to a few of my favorite sites as well as a documentary and an article I particularly like.

SunWalkWhats Up
With That?
al gore freezesThe Hockey
Schtick
SignClimate
Depot
global-warming-hoax1Documentary
(video)
climate-change1Climate
Change 101
cjohnstonClimateChangeDenialLClimate Change
Dispatch
real-scienceReal
Science
toxicind 3Dr. Roy
Spencer
TreadI Love
CO2
american-spectator-logo1America Spectator
Article
Cook“Consensus” Myth
@RPT
Climate-change-lies-illustrationGlobal Climate
Scam
✯ Appinsys
✯ Australian Climate Madness
✯ Bishop Hill
✯ Carlin Economics
✯ Climate Audit
✯ Climate Conversation – NZ
✯ Climate Resistance
✯ Climate Sanity
✯ Climate Skeptic
✯ Climate Views
✯ Cornwall Alliance
✯ CO2 Science
✯ Digging in the Clay
✯ Dr. Tim Ball
✯ Ecotretas
✯ Friends of Science
✯ Haunting the Library
✯ I Love Co2!
✯ ICECAP
✯ Jennifer Marohasy
✯ Jo Nova
✯ Master Resource
✯ Niche Modeling – David Stockwell
✯ No Frakking Consensus
✯ Small Dead Animals
✯ Solar Cycle 24 Board
✯ Surfacestations Gallery
✯ Surfacestations Main
✯ The Air Vent
✯ The Chiefio – E.M. Smith
✯ The Daily Bayonet
✯ The Next Grand minimum
✯ The Reference Frame
✯ Tom Nelson
✯ Warren Meyer
✯ Warwick Hughes
✯ William Briggs
✯ World Climate Report

“Mankind will in time discover that unbridled majorities are as tyrannical and cruel as unlimited despots”

~ John Adams 1793

After years of looking into this topic, the only consensus I could find is that the UN-IPCC and others have based their predictions on computer models that have been woefully wrong:

One of the topics I see (and hear) brought up all the time is the 97% consensus of scientists who agree man is the main prognosticator of global warming. Below are some links to many articles refuting this unscientific [if it were true] consensus:

♛ Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring ’97-Percent Consensus’ Claims (Forbes);
♛ (WSJ) The Myth of the Climate Change ‘97%’; What is the origin of the false belief that almost all scientists agree about global warming? (Hockey Schtick);
♛ 97 Articles Refuting The “97% Consensus” (Popular Technology);
♛ 97% Study Falsely Classifies Scientists’ Papers, according to the scientists that published them (Popular Technology ~ Update to Above Article!)

♛ Cooking Climate Consensus Data: “97% of Scientists Affirm AGW” Debunked (New American);
♛ Only 65 Scientists of 12,000 Make up Alleged 97% on Climate Change and Global Warming Consensus According to Breakdown of Cook et al study, say Friends of Science (Climate Change Dispatch);
♛ Undersecretary of Energy for Science For Obama Rejects “Scientism” (RPT);
♛ 100% Consensus ~ As If More Were Needed (RPT).
♛ The myth of ‘settled science’ – When the left shuts down debate, it’s time for skepticism (Washington Times)
♛ Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis (Forbes)
♛ Debunking the 97% ‘consensus’ on global warming (American Spectator)
♛ Richard Tol’s Excellent Summary of the Flaws in Cook et al. (2013) – The Infamous 97% Consensus Paper (WUWT – See Dr. Tol’s blog)
♛ The 97% Cook Consensus – when will Environ Res Letters retract it? (JoNova)
♛ UN IPCC Lead Author Dr. Richard Tol Debunks ‘97% Consensus’ Claim (Breitbart)
♛ The 97 Percent Climate Change Consensus That Wasn’t (Heartland)

No matter what you think of the following long and short lists… the bottom line is this, WAY more than 75-Climatologists think that man is either not the main contributor to global warming at all, or that global warming is not a catastrophe waiting to happen: