Climate Change Disrupted

These are links to some counter Anthropogenic [man-caused] Global Warming (AGW). In the pictures are links to a few of my favorite sites as well as a documentary and an article I particularly like.

SunWalkWhats Up
With That?
al gore freezesThe Hockey
Change 101
cjohnstonClimateChangeDenialLClimate Change
toxicind 3Dr. Roy
TreadI Love
american-spectator-logo1America Spectator
Cook“Consensus” Myth
Climate-change-lies-illustrationGlobal Climate
Australian Climate Madness
Bishop Hill
Carlin Economics
Climate Audit
Climate Conversation – NZ
Climate Resistance
Climate Sanity
Climate Skeptic
Climate Views
Cornwall Alliance
CO2 Science
Digging in the Clay
Dr. Tim Ball
Friends of Science
Haunting the Library
I Love Co2!
Jennifer Marohasy
Jo Nova
Master Resource
Niche Modeling – David Stockwell
No Frakking Consensus
Small Dead Animals
Solar Cycle 24 Board
Surfacestations Gallery
Surfacestations Main
The Air Vent
The Chiefio – E.M. Smith
The Daily Bayonet
The Next Grand minimum
The Reference Frame
Tom Nelson
Warren Meyer
Warwick Hughes
William Briggs
World Climate Report

“Mankind will in time discover that unbridled majorities are as tyrannical and cruel as unlimited despots”

~ John Adams 1793

After years of looking into this topic, the only consensus I could find is that the UN-IPCC and others have based their predictions on computer models that have been woefully wrong:

One of the topics I see (and hear) brought up all the time is the 97% consensus of scientists who agree man is the main prognosticator of global warming. Below are some links to many articles refuting this unscientific [if it were true] consensus:

♛ Global Warming Alarmists Caught Doctoring ’97-Percent Consensus’ Claims (Forbes);
♛ (WSJThe Myth of the Climate Change ‘97%’; What is the origin of the false belief that almost all scientists agree about global warming? (Hockey Schtick);
♛ 97 Articles Refuting The “97% Consensus” (Popular Technology);
97% Study Falsely Classifies Scientists’ Papers, according to the scientists that published them (Popular Technology ~ Update to Above Article!)

♛ Cooking Climate Consensus Data: “97% of Scientists Affirm AGW” Debunked (New American);
♛ Only 65 Scientists of 12,000 Make up Alleged 97% on Climate Change and Global Warming Consensus According to Breakdown of Cook et al study, say Friends of Science (Climate Change Dispatch);
♛ Undersecretary of Energy for Science For Obama Rejects “Scientism” (RPT);
♛ 100% Consensus ~ As If More Were Needed (RPT).
♛ The myth of ‘settled science’ – When the left shuts down debate, it’s time for skepticism (Washington Times)
Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis (Forbes)
Debunking the 97% ‘consensus’ on global warming (American Spectator)
Richard Tol’s Excellent Summary of the Flaws in Cook et al. (2013) – The Infamous 97% Consensus Paper (WUWT – See Dr. Tol’s blog)
The 97% Cook Consensus – when will Environ Res Letters retract it? (JoNova)
UN IPCC Lead Author Dr. Richard Tol Debunks ‘97% Consensus’ Claim (Breitbart)
The 97 Percent Climate Change Consensus That Wasn’t (Heartland)

No matter what you think of the following long and short lists… the bottom line is this, WAY more than 75-Climatologists think that man is either not the main contributor to global warming at all, or that global warming is not a catastrophe waiting to happen: