Conspiracy, Revisionism, and the Politics of Jewish Identity | Abraham Fares

A previous post correcting a pastor associated with Levant Ministries regarding the historical case for “Palestinians” is worth exploring in combination with this post.

This is just some quick hits on Fares Abraham and his distorted views of his belief and the Islamic “friends” he has in Palestine.

The claim that Palestinian children are not taught hatred, jihad, or violence against Jews is contradicted by the documented contents of Palestinian Authority schoolbooks. A November 2025 investigation by IMPACT-se found that antisemitism remains embedded in the curriculum, including Islamic-law textbooks teaching that the Bible was corrupted through Jewish plots and portraying Paul the Jew as having introduced false beliefs to corrupt Christianity. Other materials manipulate Scripture to portray Paul as endorsing jihad, glorify terrorist figures such as Dalal al-Mughrabi, romanticize martyrdom and violent struggle, and even incorporate the glorification of so-called martyrs into elementary mathematics and language lessons. The indoctrination extends beyond textbooks into school ceremonies, where children have reportedly chanted about igniting the Intifada with stones and knives while mimicking throat-slitting gestures. Against this evidence, Fares Abraham’s personal recollection that he was not taught to kill as a five-year-old proves remarkably little about what Palestinian educational institutions teach across generations. Anecdote is not curriculum analysis, and sentimental appeals to childhood experience cannot erase documented evidence of systematic indoctrination. The issue is not whether Palestinian children deserve education, dignity, and peace—they unquestionably do. It is whether those responsible for educating them are teaching tolerance or perpetuating the very hatred and violence that make peace so elusive.

SOURCE: Jules Gomes, “Review of Palestinian Schoolbooks Debunks Tucker Carlson’s ‘No Hate’ Narrative,” Middle East Forum, February 26, 2026. The article draws on IMPACT-se’s 2025–2026 curriculum research.

Notice Fares single articles get into mainstream sites/publications… but also note who he is a regular contributor to:

Fares Abraham’s interview with Tucker Carlson is a case study in how selective history, questionable biblical interpretation, and sweeping generalizations can be packaged as Christian advocacy. In a detailed examination, CAMERA’s David Orenstein challenges Abraham’s assertions that Israel prevents Messianic Jews from immigrating, prohibits Christians from preaching about Jesus, and is driving its Christian population toward extinction—a claim contradicted by Israeli demographic figures showing substantial Christian population growth. Abraham and Carlson also advance a misleading account of Jewish indigeneity, dismissing the historical connection between contemporary Jews and ancient Israel while presenting Palestinians as the land’s exclusive indigenous people. Their treatment of Zionism is similarly selective: the famous “land without a people” expression is stripped of its nineteenth-century historical context, Christian Zionists are caricatured as seeking an exclusively Jewish homeland, and support for Israel is inaccurately reduced to an obsession with rebuilding a Third Temple. But the most consequential disagreements are theological. Abraham portrays the Abrahamic land covenant as conditional, suggests Jesus repudiated Jewish national and territorial expectations, and argues that the New Testament transformed Israel’s physical land promises into something exclusively spiritual. CAMERA counters with extensive biblical, historical, and patristic evidence challenging those interpretations, including the writings of Irenaeus and Tertullian and New Testament passages in Acts, Romans, and Hebrews. The article also challenges Abraham’s sweeping portrayal of Palestinian Christians as uniformly committed to nonviolence, citing Palestinian Christian leaders who have praised suicide bombers and glorified jihad. Finally, it questions his presentation of incidents involving the Church of Saint Porphyrius and the Taybeh Church, as well as his promotion of Breaking the Silence. The larger problem is not that Abraham criticizes Israeli policies or advocates Palestinian rights; it is that his presentation repeatedly omits historical context, overlooks inconvenient evidence, and advances theological conclusions as though they were uncontested Christian orthodoxy. That is precisely why his claims deserve scrutiny rather than unquestioning acceptance simply because they come wrapped in the language of Christian compassion and peace.

The author identifies several areas of disagreement:

SUBJECT CAMERA’S CRITICISM
Messianic Jews Abraham allegedly misrepresents Israel’s immigration rules.
Christian evangelism Claims that Israel prohibits preaching about Jesus are challenged.
Christian population The suggestion that Israeli Christians are approaching extinction is challenged with demographic data.
Jewish ancestry Abraham’s comments about Palestinian and Jewish ancestry are challenged.
Indigenous identity The assertion that Palestinians alone are indigenous is challenged.
Zionist history Abraham and Carlson’s treatment of the phrase “A land without a people for a people without a land” is challenged.
Christian Zionism The article disputes Abraham’s characterization of Christian Zionism as inherently opposed to Palestinian sovereignty.
Biblical interpretation It challenges his interpretation of Galatians 4 and the Abrahamic covenant.
Third Temple It disputes the suggestion that rebuilding a Third Temple is a central motivation for Christian support of Israel.

And yes, Abraham Fares promotes genetic testing (CAMERA):

Misrepresenting the Connection of Contemporary Jews to Ancient Jews in the Land of Israel

Tucker Carlson asks his guest: “If you were to say, ‘Who lived in first-century Palestine, current-day Israel,’ are you more closely related to those people, or is Benjamin Netanyahu more closely related to those people?” Abraham responds: “They should do a DNA test and see. I did my DNA test. Palestinian Christians are [of] Levantine origin.” In response to Abraham’s statement, Carlson states: “So it’s likely that you have more Jewish ancestors than Benjamin Netanyahu, whose family’s from Europe.” Abraham responds to Carlson by stating, “Probably.”

In critiquing a similar claim made by the Dar al-Kalima University President Dr. Mitri Raheb, the New Testament scholar Malcolm Lowe stated:

Even if Raheb’s claims about the ancestry of himself and Binyamin Netanyahu were true, he would be putting them at the service of a shameless racism. But, of course, he also has not the slightest evidence to support those claims. He knows nothing of Netanyahu’s ancestry […] As for DNA, had he taken the trouble, Raheb could have found that genetic studies on Jews have shown that European Jews are genetically much more closely related to Jews in the Middle East and even to some non-Jews there, than to non-Jewish Europeans.

The insinuation that most Jews are not descended from Jews historically, but rather are Khazar descendants who converted to Judaism has been discredited. In a similar vein, Abraham suggests that Palestinians are “the indigenous people of the land,” not Jews: “We’re [Palestinians are] not from neighboring countries. We’re not converts. We’re not newcomers. We’re not immigrants. We are the indigenous people of the land.” In fact, the Middle East historian Daniel Pipes has observed that the majority of those who identify as Palestinians today are, in fact, immigrants from other locations:

[N]on-Jewish immigra[nts] to Palestine […] and their descendants probably make up a majority of the population now called Palestinian. Palestinians, in other words, are not an aboriginal, autochthonous, first, indigenous, or native people; most of them are as recently arrived as Zionists.

To suggest, as Abraham does, that Palestinians alone are indigenous to the land is, therefore, misleading. Given this view, it is not surprising that, in discussing various rulers of the territory, Carlson omits periods in antiquity when Jewish biblical kings and Hasmonean rulers exercised sovereignty over the land.

Fares Abraham’s argument turns Jewish indigeneity into a genetic competition rather than applying a consistent standard of ancestral continuity. During his Tucker Carlson interview, Abraham suggested that DNA testing should determine whether he or Benjamin Netanyahu was more closely related to the Jewish population of first-century Judea. When Carlson suggested that Abraham probably had more Jewish ancestors than Netanyahu because Netanyahu’s family came from Europe, Abraham agreed: “Probably.”

No comparative genetic evidence was presented in the interview to support that assertion. The comparison also raises a separate issue: treating European family origins as grounds to discount a Jewish ancestral connection to the land. Population-genetics research demonstrating substantial shared Middle Eastern ancestry among Jewish populations challenges that implication, but does not establish which of these two individuals is more closely related to first-century Judeans. The objection is therefore not that the interview proves Netanyahu has greater ancestral ties, but that it offers no evidence for the comparison while casting doubt on the continuity of European Jewish ancestry.

Abraham asserts Palestinian indigeneity while questioning the ancestral connection of Jews from elsewhere. To the extent that his argument accepts ancestral continuity as evidence for Palestinians but discounts it for Jews because of their diaspora origins, it applies a double standard. Historical identity, ancestral continuity, and indigeneity require consistent treatment, not a ranking of individuals by presumed genetic proximity. Centuries of diaspora and the development of Jewish communities throughout Europe and elsewhere do not, by themselves, negate the Jewish people’s documented historical connection to their ancestral homeland.

BTW, just to end, you will find in this mans orbit many very left-wing movement that incorporate Liberation Theology, socialist/Marxist friendly movements, and seminaries that push the bounds of liberal theology. All these players live on lies as well.

Playing Loose with History n Facts | Candace Owens Antisemitic Unraveling

This is one of the best shorter dealing with Candace:

The Candace Situation Gets MUCH WORSE

UPDATE: As noted at 9:14, this was filmed before last night’s screenshots. From what’s visible so far, they may show private frustration, but they do not substantiate the strongest claims (e.g., TPUSA/Israel involvement, shooter framed, audit as motive). I’ll update a “Claims & Receipts” status in my comment in the video for anything else that’s verified. If enough new information is authenticated and it changes things, I’ll do a follow-up. Candace Owens has spent the last month making explosive claims about Charlie Kirk’s assassination, from billionaires and Israel to federal coverups. But hardly any of the receipts have surfaced. This video examines what she’s said, what the evidence actually shows, and the real damage that rumors can cause.

0:00- Intro
0:43- Why People Are Mad
1:18- Claim 1: Bibi’s Letter
2:42- Claim 2: Bill Ackman’s Intervention
4:01- Claim 3: The Shooter Was Framed
4:47- Claim 4: The Text messages Were Fake
7:55- Claim 5: TPUSA in on it?
9:56- Her Journalism Mistakes
13:02- The Fallout

Here is the “Frankist” portion of Dennis Prager’s open letter to Candace:

1) Israel was founded by “Frankists” (“masquerading as Jews”).

You say: “The nation of Israel was established by some Frankists. . ..”

I taught Jewish history at Brooklyn College, and never heard or read such a thing. And even if there were any truth to it, it in no way explains the founding of Israel. For two thousand years, as part of daily ritual prayers, Jews prayed three times a day to be able to return to their homeland, Israel. That, plus the world witnessing what happens when Jews have no homeland — centuries of pogroms, massacres, and expulsions (which inspired Theodor Herzl to organize the Jews’ return to Israel — “Zionism” — in the late nineteenth century) culminating in the Holocaust — is what led to the reestablishment of the Jewish state. That Herzl came from the same general region as did Jacob Frank, who predated Herzl by about 150 years — a region with millions of Jews who were not Frankists — and therefore must have been a Frankist, seems like a pretty big leap.

2) Alleged “Frankists,” who were in fact ethnic Jews, were responsible for missing, and presumably murdered, Christian children around Passover time.

You say: “Catholics and Christians were going missing on Passover, then they would find bodies across Europe, and they were able to trace them back to Jews . . . . They weren’t Jews, OK? It was the Frankists, and just as Leo Frank killed Mary Phagan on Passover back in 1913 or 1914 — [it was done] on Passover for a reason. The Frankist cult, which masquerades behind Jews, still participates in this shit to this day. Why would you want, as a small nation that is the size of New Jersey, the pedophiles to flee there?”

Therefore, Israel was founded to be a haven for pedophiles — who, furthermore, engage in slaughtering Christians as part of a satanic ritual.

That is as close to the medieval libel of Jews — as butchers of Christian children to use their blood for baking Passover matzo — as I have heard in my lifetime. You mock the idea that this is another blood libel. But that is what it is. And given how many Jews were massacred, often tortured to death, because of it, Jews have good reason to loathe it.

You cite and deem as credible the two modern instances of the blood libel against Jews:

“Most people don’t know. They think that the nation of Israel was established because of World War II. No. There was a lot going on leading up to that. Learn about the Damascus Affair of 1840. Learn about what happened to Eszter Solymosi in Austria in 1880. There were Christians who kept on going missing on holidays and the entire Christian world rose up and began publicizing, trying to point to what they believed to be a satanic cult. Of course, all of that’s been erased. Most Christians don’t know this.”

In 1840, in Damascus, Syrian Jews were charged with butchering Capuchin friar Thomas, an Italian monk living in Damascus. The Capuchins in Damascus spread the charge, which resulted in 63 Jewish children being abducted from their families to force the families to divulge the location of the friar’s blood. And a Jewish barber named Solomon Negrin was arbitrarily arrested and tortured until a “confession” was extorted from him. Under torture Negrin said that seven Jews killed the monk in the house of David Harari. The seven men were subsequently arrested and also tortured. Two of them died under torture.

The other blood libel you cite as credible took place in Austria-Hungary in 1882. Jews were accused of murdering and beheading a 14-year-old Catholic girl named Eszter Solymosi. A girl’s body was found on the bank of the Tisza River, but though the body was dressed in Eszter’s clothes, it was not Eszter. And if it was, it proved the charges to be libelous — there was no injury to her neck.

Nevertheless, members of the local Jewish community were accused of having killed Eszter for ritual purposes, as it happened right before Passover. Jews, according to the centuries-old charge, use Christians’ blood to bake Matzo, the unleavened Passover bread.

Eventually, after 15 months of investigation, the Hungarian Highest Court (Kúria), in a unanimous verdict, acquitted of all the accused.

You repeat this libel of anti-Christian crimes committed by Jews in another podcast: “There’s a lot behind my refusal, my absolute refusal, to bend the knee to Israel, as many American politicians have done. There’s too much I’ve learned about their [Israel’s? Jews’?] history, about what was done to Christians, which they’re alleging now is blood libel — that none of that’s real, it didn’t happen. ..”

It didn’t happen, and repeating it does terrible harm. It is painful for me to know that the Candace I have known would say such things.

Candace Owens Has Drunk the Antisemitic Kool-Aid
(
FULL DR. BROWN EPISODE):

Candace Owens Has Drunk the Antisemitic Kool-Aid Dr. Brown interacts with her latest, disturbing comments, then speaks with author Jeff Myers about his important new book, Should Christians Support Israel? Seeking a Biblical Worldview in an Impossible Situation

Dr. Brown Interacts with Candace Owens and Piers Morgan
(DR.BROWN’S FULL EPISODE)

Dr. Brown Interacts with Candace Owens and Piers Morgan Dr. Brown weighs in on this recent discussion on antisemitism, charges of genocide, and more, then answers your Jewish-related questions.

Dr. Brown touches on more issues in his article, “The antisemitic unraveling of Candace Owens“

… According to Owens, Leo Frank killed Mary Phagan during Passover (in 1913) for these same nefarious, bloody purposes. (Apparently, he must have been a Frankist too, since his last name was Frank!) And, she states firmly, “this Frankist cult, which is masquerading behind Jews, still participates in this s— to this day.”

We will soon find out that it is these fake Jews who helped found Israel, which is why, she tells us, Israel is a sanctuary state for pedophiles. Surely, nothing antisemitic here! And surely, we shouldn’t stumble over the fact that most legal scholars believe that Leo Frank was falsely accused and wrongly convicted of the crime. Tragically, he was dragged from jail by an angry mob and lynched. But not to worry. After all, Frank was a Jew, right?

Owens claims that “the nation of Israel may have been established by some Frankists,” which is why “Zionists defend pedophiles and criminals.” But of course! How did we miss that? Yes, we are told, this is why Israel allows “pedophiles from America to flee and receive protection from their state.” (BTW, Owens jokes that she will punch you in the face if you dare say that Israel is our ally. They are anything but an ally and friend. All clear?)

What is Owens’s proof about the founding of Israel? “It is looking like Theodor Herzl’s family” came from the exact same area in Moravia and Bohemia “where the Frankist cult was founded.” And while Owens says “maybe” about her theory, she has read “a ton of books” and is quite sure about it. She also informs us that Herzl said that he didn’t care how many Jews had to die in order to establish the Jewish state. How did all the Herzl scholars miss this?

And why quibble over the fact that the Frankist cult originated primarily in Podolia, which is in modern-day Ukraine. After all, Ukraine, Moravia, and Bohemia are all in Europe, right? That’s pretty close! And, at some point in time, some Frankists were located in the same country where Herzl was born. So, obviously, he himself was a Frankist sex pervert, and as the founder of Israel, that explains why the Jewish state is a sanctuary for pedophiles. Candace is on a roll! And since no one questions whether Herzl was Jewish, it appears that the Frankists masquerading as Jews were Jews after all. Got it!

As for the fact that the Frankists had largely disappeared by the time of Herzl’s birth, again, why split hairs over things like chronology and history and dates and facts? Owens has a theory!

Not only so, but Owens wants us to know that Israel was involved in the assassination of JFK. It was a Mossad job!

But no one dared speak about these things. That’s because America is being held hostage by a foreign country — Israel! And so she fearlessly proclaims, “We are an occupied nation!”

But it gets darker still. Owens informs us that the first Jewish Supreme Court justice, Louis Brandeis, was a Frankist. Don’t believe her? She has an ironclad answer: “Look it up!”

Unfortunately, not even my AI bots could figure out where this nonsensical and diabolical theory came from, with AI Claude pointing out that:1. “The Frankist movement was primarily active in the 18th century, while Brandeis lived in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.”2. “Brandeis was known for his strong ethical standards and progressive reforms, which seem at odds with what is known about Frankist beliefs and practices.” 3. “There are no reputable historical sources that suggest Brandeis had any connection to Frankism.” (These are just some of the points Claude raised, which also noted, “This myth might have originated from anti-Semitic conspiracy theories …”)

But Owens has still more to say. She alleges that “every person who speaks about Israel has to basically say a statement like, ‘I don’t want to get killed.’” Yes, of course! No one in America or abroad would dare say anything negative about Israel or the Jewish people for fear of being killed by the Israelis. And if anything happens to her? “Blame the Zionists, like 1,000%, blame the Zionists …”

Thankfully, she provides an “easy litmus test” by which you can judge “any commentator.” If they don’t condemn Israel’s defense of pedophiles and acknowledge that Louis Brandeis was a Frankist, then they, too, are evil, psychopathic Zionists.

Sarcasm aside, Owens is peddling some really sick, terribly dangerous stuff, given her popularity and influence. ….

This next entry has such a good defining of the issue:

Tom Bilyeu: You’re not worried that she’s going full conspiracy?

Question to Tom: What is full conspiracy?

Tom Bilyeu: Let’s define it.

[ADAPTED]

They don’t have an internal map for how to judge whether something is plausible or merely intriguing. I think that Candace is seeing patterns where they don’t exist. There’s a big difference for me between somebody like Joe Rogan, who enjoys conspiracies, but feels very tethered to reality; and somebody like Alex Jones, who, even though he really does find a lot of this early stuff. If you watch his channel, literally every day is World War III, and everything is a conspiracy.

Candice has sort of marched her way out of the journalist box that I had in my mind, over into the icy patterns where patterns don’t exist, conspiracy theory box. I worry that she isn’t using an internal rubric with which to anchor herself to say, “okay, these things probably aren’t true.” She can make a wild claim and produce receipts [if you watch the first video in my post, you see here receipts are weak], but then another person can come along with receipts that counter it.

I have got that internal metric by which I judge things, and so I make my decisions based on that. It feels like Candace has lost that, or maybe never has, but she doesn’t have anything that she comes back to — and says: “like I say, I know better than to trust myself 100%. So, I think I have all the receipts. I still don’t trust myself 100%.” She trusts herself 1,000%. And I cannot figure out how life has taught anybody that that’s the right thing to judge things by.

Candace Owens just went hyper viral for her take on what happened to Charlie Kirk, but Tom isn’t convinced she’s seeing the full picture.

In this clip, Tom breaks down the fine line between truth-seeking and conspiracy, and why so many creators, even smart ones, risk drifting into dangerous territory when the algorithms reward outrage over evidence.

From Alex Jones to Joe Rogan, and now Candace Owens, Tom unpacks how good intentions can get lost in the noise, and what happens when confidence replaces critical thinking.

In this clip:

Why Candace Owens’ viral take raised red flags
The psychology behind “seeing patterns that aren’t there”
What it really means to think from first principles
Why Tom says “truth” is often lost in the constellation of content

Watch until the end, where Tom explains how to avoid getting trapped in echo chambers and why it’s still possible to seek truth online without losing your balance.

At the 8-minute mark there is a question to the LOUDER w/CROWDER SHOW

  • What can we say to the people who listen to Candace and believe her, it feels like talking to a leftist at this point and I’m not sure how we can break through to them.

Candace…

Candace Owens has officially jumped the shark. Pushing a baseless conspiracy that the “feds” or even the administration killed Charlie Kirk.

Candace Owens Gets Fact-Checked on Israel by Ami Kozak

I wanted to post some more recent videos that include critiques of Candace Owens. Her views on Israel have been emboldened by [maybe?] contact with Kanye, or others who hold to view of Israel that seems like they are siding with anti-Jewish forces – even if they are themselves not anti-Jewish. So with that spotty intro, enjoy

Ami Kozak educates Candace Owens & Dave Smith

Candace Owens Gets Fact-Checked on Basic Israel Facts by Jewish Comedian

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” talks to CJ Pearson and Ian Haworth about Candace Owens being corrected on-air about basic Israel facts by Jewish comedian Ami Kozak.

The FULL STORY of Candace Owens & Ami Kozak

A Green Beret RESPONDS to Dave Smith’s Question

In the wake of Dave Smith’s viral appearance on Joe Rogan, everyone’s talking about warfare, morality, and Israel. But most of the loudest voices—comedians, commentators, influencers—have never seen combat. In this clip, former Green Beret and military expert Nick Freitas explains why so many takes on Gaza and Israel—from Dave Smith and others—are not just wrong, but dangerously naive. He breaks down the real dynamics of asymmetric warfare, how groups like Hamas operate, and why civilian casualties aren’t always what they seem.

Dave Rubin Gives a Walking Tour Between Two of the Holiest Sites on Earth

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” gives a beautiful walking tour between two of the holiest sites in the world, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and the Western Wall of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.

Defending “Lutheranism” from Martin Luther’s Fall from Grace

Brought this back to the forefront due to this past “Reformation Sunday“

Luther Rose 2

This is a discussion that took place on my Facebook. And I could see where it was headed, but I wanted to see which avenue it went down… there is so many of them. I pick up the conversation where the person is trying to make a counter point to my assertion that Obama went to a very racist church for twenty years.

A religion started by a rabid anti-Semite, seems like it would be an inherently bad religion that people should denounce, right?

I prod, “Go on.”

What’s your opinion? If you believe obama going to a controversial church proves he has the same opinions as the church leader, I am curious what you think of an entire religion founded by someone who believed in killing and jailing all Jews.

[….]

Martin Luther, who wrote The Jews and Their Lies in the 1540’s which wad basically a blueprint for the holocaust. It’s sad that you need context to know whether killing Jews is bad or not…

I reference an earlier challenge to see if this person has read varying views of events in history, here I remind here of that challenge.

Have you read the book “The Fabricated Luther“? Or books about the Aryan cults such as noted in here (like my SCRIBD) or in books like “The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and Their Influence on Nazi Ideology.” Very anti-Luther — were the Aryans and Nazis. I will post an exceprt or two from the Luther book. BTW, this is what I mean about going to sources “at odds with each-other, you then contrasted and found the better narrative based on available historical evidence.”

Huh? Can you succinctly tell me what you think about Lutheranism? Is it poisoned because of Luther?

Here is the quote I was referring to, and allow me to elucidate afterwards:

The cliché labeling Luther an anti-Semite ignores his 1523 treatise That Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew, in which he admonishes his fellow Christians: “If the apostles, who were also Jews, had dealt with us Gen­tiles as we Gentiles deal with the Jews, there would never have been a Christian among the Gentiles. Since they dealt with us Gentiles in such brotherly fashion, we in turn ought to treat the Jews in a brotherly man­ner in order that we might convert some of them … We should remem­ber that we are but Gentiles, while the Jews are in the lineage of Christ?” Elsewhere in this treatise, Luther writes: “If I had been a Jew and had seen such dolts and blockheads govern and teach the Christian faith, I would sooner have become a hog than a Christian.”

It is noteworthy that in the early twentieth century, the Jewish Encyclopedia made a clear distinction between the “two Luthers”—the pro-Jewish younger Luther and the anti-Jewish older Luther. In this remarkable publication, Gotthard Deutsch melancholically observed about Luther in 1906 that the “totally different attitudes which he took at different times with regard to the Jews made him, during the anti-Semitic controversies of the end of the nineteenth century, an authority quoted alike by friends and enemies of the Jews?”

Alas, it is true that in 1543, shortly before his death, Luther pub­lished his venomous book On the Jews and Their Lies, a work that was to cause great embarrassment to future centuries of Lutheran church lead­ers. In this book, he gave the “sincere advice” to burn down the syna­gogues, destroy the Jews’ homes, take away their prayer books, forbid rabbinic teaching, abolish safe-conduct for Jewish travel, prohibit usury, and force Jews into manual labor.

Johannes Wallmann has shown, however, that Luther’s treatises against the Jews, though reprinted in the late-sixteenth and early-sev­enteenth centuries, had limited impact in the general population. As the article in the Jewish Encyclopedia made clear, this and other appalling texts did not resurface until the late nineteenth century. In fact, in a devastating critique of German Protestant attitudes in the Hitler years, Richard Steigmann-Gall writes: “Not only did racialist anti-Semitism find a warmer reception among liberal Protestants than among confessional Lutherans, in many ways, racialist anti-Semitism was born of the theological crisis that liberal Protestantism represented …” Liberal Protestantism is a child of the nineteenth century. According to Steigmann-Gall, it provided the platform for Nazi ideologues to develop such theories as the one that Jesus was an Aryan. In other words, Protestants who were theologically closest to Luther’s teachings were more immune than liberals to one of the ugliest aspects of Nazism—racism. This observation could arguably also be made about deviant and sometimes lethal theologoumena that are currently rife in mainline churches in the United States and elsewhere in the West.

Uwe Siemon-Netto, The Fabricated Luther: Refuting Nazi Connections and Other Modern Myths, 2nd Edition (Saint Loiuse, MS: Concordia Publishing, 2007), 51-52.

Here is the point, Lutheranism was founded well BEFORE his 1543 anti-Semitic writing… when he was VERY Jewish friendly.

SO — Lutheranism was founded on the pro-Jewish Luther. It was leftism in it’s various shades that chose the later Luther.

In Germany (and the U.S.), the eugenic movement was founded by left leaning secular and religious persons. Lutheran churches (read here — especially conservative Lutheran churches — but all) have denounced this racism from “later Luther.”

Has Obama denounced his ties to Farrakhan, his churches teaching that blacks are the true Jews? Have you heard his church of 20-years denounce Farrakhan or the New Black Panther members that sit in its pews? Have you heard Michelle Obama denounce her affiliations to Farrakhan’s wife?

You see, you are setting up a non-sequitur… and emboldening my case that racism exists on the Left… much more-so than in conservative politics or conservative religion.

From eugenicists and the real NAZIs (an acronym with socialism in it), to before that and the founding of the KKK and, to our country entering into a Civil War, to the founder of Planned Parenthood. On-and-on:

▼ “…virtually every significant racist in American political history was a Democrat.” Bruce Bartlett, Wrong on Race: The Democratic Party’s Buried Past (New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008), ix;

▼ “…not every Democrat was a KKK’er, but every KKK’er was a Democrat.” Ann Coulter, Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama (New York, NY: Sentinel [Penguin], 2012), 19.

The history of Protestantism and Catholicism saving Jews in WWII is another proud moment to understand (for instance the book by the Jewish Rabbi entitled: “The Myth of Hitler’s Pope: Pope Pius XII And His Secret War Against Nazi Germany”), Einstein did:

“Being a lover of freedom, when the [Nazi] revolution came, I looked to the universities to defend it, knowing that they had always boasted of their devotion to the cause of truth; but no, the universities were immediately silenced. Then I looked to the great editors of the newspapers, whose flaming editorials in days gone had proclaimed their love of freedom; but they, like the universities, were silenced in a few short weeks… Only the Church stood squarely across the path of Hitler’s campaign for suppressing the truth. I never had any special interest in the Church before, but now I feel a great affection and admiration for it because the Church alone has had the courage and persistence to stand for intellectual and moral freedom. I am forced to confess that what I once despised I now praise unreservedly.”

Albert Einstein Time Magazine, December 23, 1940 (page 38); Mackay, J. A. 1939. “The Titanic Twofold Challenge,” New York Times Magazine, May 7, p. 3.

Here are two additional resources to consider, the first is via Ray Comfort:

As we wonder how Hitler could have claimed to be a Christian, and how the church in Germany could have been duped by his policies, it makes no sense… until we understand something extremely important.

In pre-Second World War Germany, there were 40 million Lutherans. It is significant to realize that to be part of the Lutheran church in those days one need not be converted to Christ. As with the Roman Catholic church, children were simply baptized into the church as infants because they had to be a member to be married or buried. That was just the way it was. If for some reason an individual wanted to separate himself from the church, his name would be read from the pulpit for three Sundays and intercession was then made for him in public prayer. Consequently few took the radical step of leaving the church.

For years the denomination had been influenced by a theological liberalism that was really only secular philosophy disguised by religious language. So rather than being a vibrant Christ-centered lighthouse of biblical truth, the Lutheran church of that time (as with many contemporary denominations) was simply a huge traditional institution. The problem with the German people was that they couldn’t recognize true Christianity from hollow religious jargon.

And this from Richard Weikart:

… German Protestantism had largely adopted theological liberalism, especially in the university theology faculties. Theological liberalism tended to dismiss many parts of the Bible as historically unreliable and rejected the miraculous. It opposed the idea of the inherent sinfulness of humanity and stressed the immanence rather than the transcendence of God. It also embraced Friedrich Schleiermacher’s stress on individual religious experience or feeling, thus making religion impervious to scientific or historical criticism even while admitting such criticism’s validity in the empirical realm.

Though theological liberalism dominated the German theological scene by the early twentieth century, some Protestants remained theologically conservative. Further, immediately after World War I, the Protestant theologian Karl Barth helped initiate a new movement—sometimes called neo-orthodoxy—which challenged liberal theology by emphasizing the authority of all of God’s Word and stressing the sinfulness of humanity and the transcendence of God. Barth and neo-orthodox theologians did not reject biblical criticism, but they interpreted scripture in an existential sense, rather than as empirical historical claims.

Though the majority of Germans still identified as Christians, competing religious and secular philosophies had undermined the loyalty of a minority. During the eighteenth-century Enlightenment, some German intellectuals dispensed with the notion of a miracle-working God or a divine Jesus. Instead, they embraced deism, a rationalistic concept of a God who created the world to operate according to fixed scientific laws and then left it to run on its own accord. Many deists remained in the churches, especially in the Protestant Church, pushing it in a more liberal direction.

In the Romantic backlash against Enlightenment rationalism in the last decade of the eighteenth and opening decades of the nineteenth century, religion became more intellectually respectable. However, many Romantics were not entranced with traditional Christianity; they found pantheism more congenial to their mystical love of nature. Pantheism, the worship of nature or the cosmos as God, exerted a powerful influence on German intellectual life throughout the nineteenth century. In 1835, the poet Heinrich Heine asserted, “Nobody says it, but everyone knows it: pantheism is an open secret in Germany. We have in fact outgrown deism. We are free and want no thundering tyrant.” Sometimes known as monism, pantheism diverged into two main branches in the nineteenth century: a mystical or idealistic form and a scientific or naturalistic version. German idealism prevailed in German philosophy in the early nineteenth century, so idealistic pantheism was more pronounced then. Later in the nineteenth century, science and materialism became more significant forces in German intellectual life, giving impetus to naturalistic varieties of pantheism. After World War I, pantheism experienced resurgence among German intellectuals, so it was still intellectually viable during Hitler’s political career.

In addition to pantheism, a position known as panentheism also emerged during the Romantic era. Panentheism is close to pantheism, but not quite the same, since it teaches that nature is a part of God, but God also transcends nature to some extent. In this view, nature is divine, but it is not all of God. In pantheism, God and nature are completely identical. ….

More Weikart

I am very aware of his “evolving” thoughts on Jews but the effects of his venomous thoughts, no matter how late in life they came, on the real life of Jews around the world cannot be ignored. You should consider be so kind to everyone.

Okay, no one is denying this? But Lutheranism was not founded on Anti-Semitism. Obama’s church was. It would be analogous to me going to a liberal, NAZI, Lutheran church in Germany for 20-years.

While a couple other things were said, the above is a good way to defend Church history, while still admitting Luther’s later fall from grace. (Mind you with a little RPT religio-political “swerve” thrown in.) Here is a good short video by egwpisteuw, here is his video description:

An analysis of the error in Bible interpretation made by Martin Luther which caused him to become antisemitic and to write the treatise entitled “Von den Juden und ihren Lügen” “Of the Jews and Their Lies.”

Here is a longer video lecture by a pastor:

  • Luther and the Jews. In the 1520’s, Martin Luther strongly opposed the Church’s stand toward the Jewish people. He wanted to help them come to Christ, and believed this would be accomplished by extending Christian brotherly love and charity to them. However, by the 1540s, (Towards the end of his life), Martin Luther wrote some very anti-Semitic material. This document was not widely publicized (only going through a few printings) and was practically forgotten for hundreds of years, until it was discovered and turned into propaganda by the Nazis.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali Discusses the Amsterdam Pogrom (Al Sharpton’s Version)

Today on The Free Press Live, Michael Moynihan and Batya Ungar-Sargon interview Ayaan Hirsi Ali on the recent violence in Amsterdam directed toward Jewish residents—and what this disturbing event signals about ongoing trends in the West.


New York’s Pogrom Leader Made a “Kingmaker”


Among those calling for former President Donald Trump’s conviction for the impeachment charge of incitement to insurrection is none other than the Rev. Al “No Justice, No Peace” Sharpton. No joke. Now, the reverend doesn’t have the most credible voice when speaking about justice or peace. On the contrary, his past activism reveals otherwise. Larry revisits Rev. Sharpton’s list of lies in this episode, from the Tawana Brawley scandal to 5 million debt in taxes. Ladies and gentlemen, without further ado, Larry presents the Rev. Al Sharpton: “Democratic Kingmaker.” (Many links at Larry’s video description)

Larry Elder reminds the audience about these two characters credibility… and the hypocrisy that suits their need. More:

  • Democratic Race Hustlers in Ferguson | |
  • Larry Elder Works Through Obama’s Re-Inserting Racism Into the Trayvon Martin Affair | |

American Infidels and the Left | Screams Before Silence

This entire post bleeds into the video at the end. I suggest you at last skip all this fodder, as important as it is, and watch that video at the bottom.

This is the video [below] that caused Google to remove Prager University’s ap from their store:

  • (PJ-MEDIA) There are messages that do not conform to the Accepted Narrative. If the messengers cannot be controlled, they have to be eliminated. So it should come as no surprise that a tech giant, with a history of left-wing proclivities and a cozy relationship with Democrats in power, found the excuse it needed to silence a dissident voice. (See also RIGHT SCOOP)

Radical Islam poses a significant threat to our freedom. The rise of anti-American rhetoric and violence in cities and universities is a direct result of the indoctrination led by those perpetrating a religious war against the West. PragerU’s short documentary features first-hand accounts from those who escaped Islamic rule and have come to warn America.

Featuring:

  • Ayman Abu Suboh (later Dor Shachar), a Palestinian who escaped to Israel from the terror of Hamas and later converted to Judaism.
  • Sophia Salma Khalifa, an Arab Muslim born in Israel who moved to the U.S. to earn her master’s degree from Stanford University.
  • Omar Vieira, retired U.S. Navy SEAL who served for 21 years and led high-risk operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other locations in the Middle East.
  • Jason Tuschen, retired U.S. Navy SEAL Command Master Chief who served for 27 years and was responsible for executing National Security Strategy in the Middle East.

MORE:

Just a couple, related , stories that I cam across recently. But first, just some excerpts on what we already know: “Amid a bitter election-year debate over illegal immigration, FBI Director Chris Wray told a Senate panel on Monday that dangerous individuals have entered the United States illegally at the southern border. (ABC)”

This story garnered the Left’s attention to say, “Ha, the open border in the South is not the issue…”

  • 736 known or suspected terrorists apprehended at U.S. border in fiscal 2023 – 66% of those apprehended at northern border (CENTER SQUARE)

However, the question becomes this… how many got away on our Southern Border? Remember, the number is higher today

These numbers don’t include gotaways, which are believed to also include KSTs. “Gotaways” is the official U.S. Customs and Border Patrol term that refers to those who illegally enter the U.S. between ports of entry, don’t return to Mexico or Canada, and are not apprehended. They total at least nearly 1.7 million since January 2021. However, the number is believed to be much higher because not all gotaways are known and or reported.

With people illegally entering the U.S. from over 170 countries, former ICE Chief Tom Homan told The Center Square some of these countries they are coming from are sponsors of terrorism.

“If you don’t think a single one of the 1.7 million [gotaways] is coming from a country that sponsors terrorism, then you’re ignoring the data,” he said. “That’s what makes this a huge national security issue.”

But yes, both borders are under assault: “Terrorist watch list apprehensions at northern border continue to break records.” Now you know the rest of the story.

Hijrah

In Islam, there is the idea of Hijrah.

The Hijrah, in Islamic lore, was the migration of Muhammad and his followers from Mecca to Medina, where the Muslims ultimately outnumbered the local population and took over the city. Ever since then, Muslim migration to non-Muslim lands for the purpose of turning them Muslim is part of Islamic doctrine.

In fact, in the Qu’ran, Sura 4, Verse 100 says…

“And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on the earth many locations and abundance. And whoever leaves his home as an emigrant to Allah and His Messenger and then death overtakes him, his reward has already become incumbent upon Allah. And Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful.”

Confirming the above video, PJ-MEDIA notes the “Sharia Courts” growth in Europe. And now Europe is in a battle under reported:

…. The English actor-turned-political-activist Lawrence Fox recently noted what was happening: “The Mayor of London is a Muslim. The mayor of Birmingham is a Muslim. The Mayor of Leeds is Muslim. Mayor of Blackburn – Muslim. The mayor of Sheffield is a Muslim. The mayor of Oxford is a Muslim. The mayor of Luton is a Muslim. The mayor of Oldham is Muslim. The mayor of Rochdale is Muslim. All this was achieved by only 4 million Muslims out of 66 million people in England.”

This kind of thing has happened before, but few remember. Back in the days when our schools and universities concentrated on teaching actual facts rather than leftist propaganda, race hatred, and gender fantasy, every schoolchild learned about the Norman conquest of England in 1066. Nowadays one would be hard-pressed to find someone under twenty who knows what a “Norman” was (they were people from Normandy, in northern France, where a large number of Norsemen from Scandinavia had settled), but a few decades ago any random student would have been able to tell you that this conquest was not just a military victory. It heralded the thorough transformation of English society.

The invading Normans were few in number compared to the English, but once they had defeated the defenders, they set about systematically to ensure that England would remain theirs in perpetuity. They removed the native English from positions of political and ecclesiastical power. Norman French mingled with the Old English language, ultimately creating the English language as we know it today. Historian Richard Southern observed that “no country in Europe, between the rise of the barbarian kingdoms and the 20th century, has undergone so radical a change in so short a time as England experienced after 1066.”

Until now. Lawrence Fox continued: “Today there are over 3,000 mosques in England. There are over 130 sharia courts. There are more than 50 Sharia Councils. 78 percent of Muslim women do not work, receive state support + free accommodation. 63 percent of Muslims do not work, receive state support + free housing. State-supported Muslim families with an average of 6 to 8 children receive free accommodation. Now every school in the UK is required to teach lessons about Islam. Has anyone ever been given an opportunity to vote for this?”

All this has already transformed Britain, and much more is to come. JNS recently reported that “honor-based abuse cases in England rose by more than 60% in two years, with 2,594 cases in 2022 vs. 1,599 in 2020.” It pointed out that “such crimes are common in many Muslim countries, including Pakistan and Bangladesh. (1.6 million people, or 2.7%, of the United Kingdom’s population identify as Pakistani, and 94,434, or 1.1%, as Bangladeshi, according to the 2022 U.K. census.)” Now honor crimes will be common in a new Muslim country, Britain. …..

Douglas Murray

‘Morally wicked’: Douglas Murray calls out commentator defending Hamas’ charter

Author Douglas Murray has called out an American political commentator for defending Hamas’ charter and claiming it does not want to kill Jewish people in Israel. Briahna Joy Gray claimed Hamas wants to limit the idea of a Jewish state and wants a democracy similar to what is seen in the United States. “There is something morally wicked about doing that. She would accept that in no other situation of something to explain what a terrorist group actually seeks to do,” Mr Murray told Sky News host Rita Panahi.

Susan Sarandon
#MeeTooUnlessYouAreAJew

Now, Susan Sarandon

NEWSBUSTERS has more on the issues with Susan and her #BelieveAllWomen… except Jewish women stance (BTW, the few week old video commentary included [to the right] has some rough language for those sensitive to it):

Susan Sarandon isn’t letting cancellation curb her pro-Palestinian views.

The Oscar-winning actress lost her representation late last year after uttering this tone-deaf comparison at a pro-Palestinian rally

Bottom of Form

“There are a lot of people that are afraid, that are afraid of being Jewish at this time, and are getting a taste of what it feels like to be a Muslim in this country.”

She also shouted along with the crowd, “Long live the Intifada,” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” according to The New York Post. Both comments are steeped in violent, antisemitic tropes.

[….]

Social media user Keren Picker walked with Sarandon during yet another pro-Palestinian protest in late April. Picker pressed the star on her positions regarding the Israeli/Hamas war. That included the mountains of evidence that Hamas did more than butcher hundreds of women.

The terror group sexually assaulted them in the most barbaric ways possible. 

Sarandon dubbed those assaults mere “myths.”

“We know that all of those myths about babies in ovens and the rapes,” Sarandon said in response to Picker’s interrogation.

“It’s not a myth. You’re denying, you’re denying the terror actions made on October 7th to so many innocent civilians,” Picker countered. She shared the exchange on Instagram….

SKY NEWS AUSTRALIA covered this topic well:

AMI HOROWITZ

‘Me too unless you’re a Jew’: Ami Horowitz slams Susan Sarandon’s stance on Israel-Hamas war

Filmmaker Ami Horowitz says actress Susan Sarandon “dropped the veneer” of being anti-Israel and instead is openly an anti-Semite. Mr Horowitz joined Sky News Australia host Rita Panahi to discuss the actress’ stance on the Israel-Hamas war. “Susan Sarandon had dropped the veneer of simply being anti-Israel but being an open anti-Semite a while ago,” he said. “You can believe the New York Times – I’m sure is Susan Sarandon’s Bible, that interviewed 150 rape victims, rape counsellors, medical emergency personnel, and actually had video the rapes that happened, you can do that, or you can believe Hamas, because that’s essentially what she’s doing. “I mean, me too unless you’re a Jew.”

Her radicalism is reverberating through a film being made. Here is DAILY MAIL’S story on her anti-Semitism ruining what should b a fun film to make:

… The plot will follow three longtime friends who travel to Key West, Florida to be bridesmaids in a surprise wedding for their other close pal, played by Midler.

But despite playing a group of loving gal pals on screen, insiders tell DailyMail.com that the relationship between Sarandon and her co-stars was fraught on set after she persisted with her controversial campaign following her previous anti-Semitic remarks. 

‘Bleecker Street is furious at Susan for the way she’s been carrying on. So is Bette, who is a proud Jew and hates what Susan is doing,’ a film insider told DailyMail.com. 

‘Sheryl is upset at her too, as is Megan Mullally, the whole crew and cast are. It’s a mess. 

‘Her co-stars are disappointed that so many people worked so hard on it, and now Susan is ruining it for everybody.’….

Screams Before Silence

Which brings me all the way to this excellent, but truly tragic — tragic because it had to be made at all — documentary:

A must-watch documentary. #ScreamsBeforeSilence sheds light on the unspeakable sexual violence committed on October 7. As heartbreaking as these stories in the documentary are, we cannot afford to look away. (ORIGINAL FILE)

A Small Tribute of Anti-Israel Propaganda for Roger Waters

Originally Posted on August 14, 2014

(I am uploading this 12-29-23 because the old YouTube embed forces you to go to YouTube. I will not change the posts date) This is an old-old video from the Pallywood days of the Intifada from years back (Aug 6, 2014). The original file can be found here. Roger Waters is an anti-Semite who was [and does] promote terror against Israel. There is a documentary on Roger Waters “anti-Jewishness” – here is a short review of it:

This (the above and below) is with thanks to Moonbattery!

John Quincy Adams is worth reading at greater length on the topic, as he provides some insight into what has been going on in Iraq now that Obama has prematurely removed our troops:

In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar [i.e., Muhammad], the Egyptian, […..] Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST. – TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE…. Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant … While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good will towards men.

Winston Churchill deserves a longer hearing too:

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

“Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”

Islam has not changed over the centuries. All that has changed is that never before have we been ruled by people who take Islam’s side against us.

New Rule: From the River to the Sea | Bill Maher

This is by far one of Bill Maher’s best “New Rules” segment. Love it! However, he is still a socialist on the economic front and a sleazeball on the moral front — that is, what backs moral ethics in society.

It may be a “magical time of year,” but what we all really need right now is a good dose of realism about Israel and Palestine.

Calling For Genocide of Jews is “Contextual” | Elise Stefanik

“Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate your code of conduct?” Harvard, MIT and Penn presidents calls for Jewish genocide on campus?

Elise Joins Harris Faulkner on Faulkner Focus (12/06/2023)

“I was forced to leave my study group because my group members told me that the people at the Nova music festival deserved to die because they were partying on stolen land.”

Rep Elise Stefanik Exposes Harvard University’s Antisemitism

The Left Calls the GOP Fascist (Lol)

This is from a guy involved in a conspiracy org, so I will not mention him… but I do have a broad disclaimer of sorts:

  • While I like their rants (Paul Watson, Mark Dice, and others) and these commentaries hold much truth in them, I do wish to caution you… he is part of Info Wars/Prison Planet and Summit News network of yahoos, a crazy conspiracy arm of Alex Jones shite. Also, I bet if I talked to him he would reveal some pretty-crazy conspiratorial beliefs that would naturally undermine and be at-odds-with some of his rants. Just to be clear, I do not endorse these people or orgs.

1-minute video:

This is a good fit with my following posts (Oldest to Newest):

The Last Line of Defense | Bari Weiss

This is via a hat-tip to Ayaan Hirsi Ali who says: “Very Powerful. Do as Bari urges us to do: Get Up and Fight.” The introduction by Mr. Theodore W. Ullyot, Co-Chairman, Board of Visitors, The Federalist Society — is here.

Barbara K. Olson Memorial Lecture | The Federalist Society, November 10, 2023 (Washington, D.C.)

The Last Line of Defense By Bari Weiss

CNN, MSNBC, ABC are Hamas’s Air Force | Verdict Ep. 184

CNN is Hamas’s air force. MSNBC is Hamas’s Air force. ABC is Hamas’s Air force. That may seem like hyperbole and exaggeration but look at the facts! In this episode of “Verdict with Ted Cruz,” we show you example after example of how the mainstream media repeats Hamas’s lies.

CNN, MSNBC, ABC are Hamas’s Air Force