Year: 2011
Serious Saturday~Billy Graham on Technology and Faith
BARF!! Obama refers to himself as~The Gipper~in farewell to Gibbs
C’mon~You Know You Want This Guy Knocked Out!
Selective Racism
Friday Fodder
Pen Skills
Smart Cow
Tree Cat
“Super” Goats
Fail Mega-Comp
Pigford Update~What Big Government Does to Minorities and Businesses
Posers
From HotAir:
Most of us got a rueful laugh from the dating technique of now-former Congressman Chris Lee (R-NY), especially his posing for his on-line “outreach to voters.” But posing has a long tradition in Washington DC, and Lee’s is hardly the most egregious, even if it was briefly entertaining. (Did that set a speed record for scandal resolution? Nothing in DC takes only 36 hours to accomplish!) Michael Ramirez, the two-time Pulitzer Prize winning editorial cartoonist at Investors Business Daily, reminds readers today that Lee’s posing at least had the virtue of being the least expensive we’ve seen:
BREAKING NEWS: Mubarak Out! Who Is In?
AOL~How the Mighty Have Fallen
(Begins at the 2:50 mark)
The above video has Sean Hannity and Brent Bozell discussion AOL and its buyout of the Huffington Post. A move that may prove to be the demise of them:
AOL stock sheds $315M — HuffPo price tag
You pay for what you get.
Arianna Huffington and Ken Lerer, co-founders of the Huffington Post, are said to be walking away with a combined $80 million to $100 million from an original $2 million per person investment — but so far AOL stockholders aren’t seeing that kind of return.
Since Feb. 1, the price of AOL shares has dropped from $23.85 to $20.89 at yesterday’s close.
With 106.7 million shares outstanding, that means AOL has shed $315 million in value over the last five trading days — which happens to be exactly the same price AOL agreed to pay to acquire HuffPo.
Most media observers viewed it as a pricey deal, since it is based not on the slim profit Huffington Post claimed it made in 2010, on $31 million in revenue, or the $10 million profit it is projecting it will ring up this year on $50 million in estimated revenue, but rather on the $30 million in profit it is predicting for 2012.
“I thought, from a financial valuation, it is a bit of a stretch,” said Clayton Moran, who follows the stock for the Benchmark Company….
(source)
![](https://religiopoliticaltalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/woody-woodpecker-pictures-65465.jpg)
Woodpecker Technology Coming to a Store Near You (From God to You)
I found this very interesting article on the beak of the woodpecker and its applicability to shock absorption. I will import the article in its entirety with the LINK TO THE ARTICLE/AUTHOR in full sight. Enjoy!
Woodpecker drumming inspires shock-absorbing system
One of the pleasures of walking through a wood is hearing the distant drumming of woodpeckers. We know they are searching for food, but few of us grasp the extraordinary nature of their achievement. Drumming rates of about 20 impacts per second are normal, with decelerations of 1200 g, and the drumming sessions may be repeated 500-600 times per day. By contrast, humans can lose consciousness when experiencing 4-6 g and are left concussed with a single deceleration of about 100 g. The authors of a recent analysis of the woodpecker’s shock-absorbing mechanism describes it as “advanced” and “special”. By looking at video material of drumming and CT scans of the bird’s head and neck, they found four structures that absorb mechanical shock:
“These are its hard-but-elastic beak; a sinewy, springy tongue-supporting structure that extends behind the skull called the hyoid; an area of spongy bone in its skull; and the way the skull and cerebrospinal fluid interact to suppress vibration.” (source)
Informed by these findings, the research sought to mimic these characteristics and construct a system that could protect micromachined devices from high-g impacts.
“To mimic the beak’s deformation resistance, they use a cylindrical metal enclosure. The hyoid’s ability to distribute mechanical loads is mimicked by a layer of rubber within that cylinder, and the skull/cerebrospinal fluid by an aluminium layer. The spongy bone’s vibration resistance is mimicked by closely packed 1-millimetre-diameter glass spheres, in which the fragile circuit sits.”
To test out their shock-absorbing material, they used a 60 mm air gun capable of generating scenarios of 60,000 g. For comparison, a hard resin shock absorbing system was used (representing current state-of-the-art technology). They fired micromachined devices and checked them for damage. They found that the hard resin system protected up to 40,000 g but 26.4% were damaged at 60,000 g. By contrast:
“In the bio-inspired shock absorbing system, almost all the micromachined devices survived at a high-g mechanical excitation of 60,000 g. This is because high-frequency mechanical excitations corresponding to the resonance frequencies of the micromachined devices are absorbed by the bio-inspired shock-absorbing system and even the transmitted mechanical excitations are detoured around the micromachined devices.”
The researchers are understandably pleased with their new shock-absorbing system, and already the work is creating interest – with many diverse application areas (see Marks). Of particular interest here is the way woodpecker drumming has stimulated this research and has provided the conceptual model for developing the biomimetic system. The authors refer to the conventional Darwinian framework for understanding design in nature:
“Nature causes some traits that aid survival and reproduction to become commoner, and makes other traits that hinder them to become rarer; all creatures in nature are believed to be perfectly equipped with biological features over successive generations through natural selection.”
If this is the much-vaunted role of Darwinism underpinning biology, then it is not impressive. When the designs make the organism “perfectly equipped”, Darwinism is the explanation; when the designs are ‘imperfect’ and ‘cobbled together’, Darwinism is the explanation. Whatever the evidence, Darwinism has the answer! Yet, when the power of natural selection to select characters is studied, it does not appear very effective at all. Whether it is finch beaks or peppered moths, the classic proofs of the power of natural selection do not take us very far. The suggestion that natural selection acting on successive generations of woodpeckers is a convincing explanation of all the adaptations necessary for the birds to engage in drumming must be challenged. What we have here is a complex and sophisticated system of interrelated traits. Natural selection does not begin to address the assembly of such an exquisite design. The only way we know such systems can be assembled is, like the researchers’ new shock-absorbing system, by intelligent design.
Sang-Hee Yoon and Sungmin Park, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 6(1), 2011, 016003 | doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/6/1/016003
Abstract: A woodpecker is known to drum the hard woody surface of a tree at a rate of 18 to 22 times per second with a deceleration of 1200 g, yet with no sign of blackout or brain damage. As a model in nature, a woodpecker is studied to find clues to develop a shock-absorbing system for micromachined devices. Its advanced shock-absorbing mechanism, which cannot be explained merely by allometric scaling, is analyzed in terms of endoskeletal structures. In this analysis, the head structures (beak, hyoid, spongy bone, and skull bone with cerebrospinal fluid) of the golden-fronted woodpecker, Melanerpes aurifrons, are explored with x-ray computed tomography images, and their shock-absorbing mechanism is analyzed with a mechanical vibration model and an empirical method. Based on these analyses, a new shock-absorbing system is designed to protect commercial micromachined devices from unwanted high-g and high-frequency mechanical excitations. The new shock-absorbing system consists of close-packed microglasses within two metal enclosures and a viscoelastic layer fastened by steel bolts, which are biologically inspired from a spongy bone contained within a skull bone encompassed with the hyoid of a woodpecker. In the experimental characterizations using a 60 mm smoothbore air-gun, this bio-inspired shock-absorbing system shows a failure rate of 0.7% for the commercial micromachined devices at 60 000 g, whereas a conventional hard-resin method yields a failure rate of 26.4%, thus verifying remarkable improvement in the g-force tolerance of the commercial micromachined devices
- See also: Marks, P. Woodpecker’s head inspires shock absorbers, New Scientist (4 February 2011)
The Job Killing President and His Policies
Gateway Pundit has this video of forward charging Republican Congressman John Shimkus “interviewing” Lisa Jackson in a House Energy and Commerce Committee:
Big Government reported in October: A recent report from the Senate Environment and Public Works committee detailed how the EPAs new backdoor regulations will cause a shocking job loss – nearly a million jobs. In their quest “green” the nation, the EPA is steamrolling over American industries – cement, steel and coal, among others – with unrealistic standards and impossibly complex regulations, threatening thousands upon thousands of jobs, not just in the industries themselves, but in the surrounding communities that depend heavily on the industries’ welfare.
Related… House democrat Dem Rep. Markey announced at the hearing, “If GOP Blocks The EPA, The Terrorists Win.”