JUMP TO EXAMPLES | JUMP TO TESTIMONY
Todd Hermann fills in for Rush Limbaugh and at the beginning of hour 3 he goes on a good rant about The Big Lies. (See Rush’s site about the show)
- Reasons Why The 2020 Presidential Election Is Deeply Puzzling: If Only Cranks Find the Tabulations Strange, Put Me Down As A Crank (SPECTATOR)
- 5 More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms: Surely The Journalist Class Should Be Intrigued By The Historic Implausibility Of Joe Biden’s Victory. That They Are Not Is Curious, To Say The Least (THE FEDERALIST)
- Legitimacy Of Biden Win Buried By Objective Data: Emerging Information From The States Render His Victory Less And Less Plausible (AMERICAN SPECTATOR)
- T H E I M M A C U L A T E D E C E P T I O N (LARRY ELDER, or, PDF, or, PETER NAVARRO AUDIO)
- EXCLUSIVE: Peter Navarro Expands Election Fraud Memo, Number Of Illegal Ballots Dwarf Biden Victory Margin By Over Two (Peter Navarro released an exclusive update to his “Immaculate Deception” – NATIONAL PULSE)
- A Simple Test for the extent of Vote Fraud with Absentee Ballots in the 2020 Presidential Election: Georgia and Pennsylvania Data. John R. Lott, Jr., Ph.D. (Revised December 21, 2020) (SCRIBD)
- Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement? (AMERICAN GREATNESS)
- What Would It Take To Convince You The Election Was Rigged? (STREAM)
- Massive 78% Of Mail-In Ballots Proved Fraudulent, Judge Orders Election Do-Over (NATIONAL PULSE)
Rand Paul breaks down voter fraud step-by-step as dem senators scream internally. (Ken Starr)
Just a Few Examples of Voter Fraud
Ballots Counted Multiple Times
Vote Tally Centers Breaking Rules
Undercover Investigations
Testimony
MORE TESTIMONY!
LIBERTY PEN VIDEOS
I just wish to add context to the claims made in this first LIBERTY PEN video from a previous post of mine:
I included the excerpt of Larry O’Connor discussing just how many ballots were adjudicated of the absentee ballots — at the time of the audio 113,130 ballots were counted, and 106,000 were adjudicated. The percentage of guessing voter intent was 93.6% – wow. Here is the video:
- Georgia Elections Director casually admits that 94% of 113,000 ballots needed adjudication. Huh? (read that video description).
In other words, a voter review panel interprets voter intent… at a 94% rate? This is illegal, and what’s worse, is that the re is no way to check these changes.
Also, watch Dr. Coomer explain how easy it is to change votes using Dominion systems “adjudication” part:
- Dr. Eric Coomer – How To Change Votes (2nd video in my post)
The WASHINGTON TIMES notes that in
…The report authors said they “observed an error rate of 68.05%” with ballot counts — a “significant and fatal error in security and election integrity” that far surpasses the “allowable election error rate” of 0.0008%, or one-in-250,000 ballots, that’s been established by the Federal Election Commission.
What’s interesting, too, is that state and county officials didn’t want to release information on Antrim County’s voting equipment for analysts’ review.
A judge had to order its release.
From the Detroit Free Press: “Judge Kevin Elsenheimer of the 13th Circuit Court had ordered ‘forensic imaging’ of the Dominion Voting Systems voting tabulators and related software after Antrim County resident William Bailey filed a lawsuit that challenged the integrity of the election equipment, citing errors in how the county initially reported its unofficial results.”
Come on, now. Why the need to go to court to obtain access to data and information that should already be transparent and public?…
- Vote Manipulation Wisconsin Style: Election Worker Testimony
- Vote Manipulation Zuckerberg-Style : The Analysis of Phill Kline
- Vote Manipulation Michigan-Style 9: Election Workers Testimony 4
- Vote Manipulation: Dominion Voting Systems
- Vote Manipulation Confirmed – Restoring Election Integrity
- Vote Manipulation Michigan Style-8: Election Workers Testimony 3
- Vote Manipulation Democratic Party-Style 2: The Analysis of Daniel Horowitz
- Vote Manipulation Michigan-Style 7: Election Workers Testimony 2
- Vote Manipulation Michigan-Style 6: Testimony of Election Workers
- Vote Manipulation Michigan-Style 5: The Testimony of Patrick Colbeck
- Vote Manipulation Georgia Style 2: Chain of Custody
- Vote Manipulation Georgia-Style 1: The Ballots Under the Table
- Vote Manipulation Pennsylvania-Style: The Experience of Jesse Morgan
- Vote Manipulation Michigan-Style 4: The Testimony of Col. Phil Waldron
- Vote Manipulation Michigan-Style 3: The Testimony of Hima Kolanagireddy
- Vote Manipulation Michigan-Style 2: The Testimony of Melissa Carone
- Vote Manipulation Michigan-Style 1: The Testimony of Jesse Jacobs
COUNTIES w/DOMINION MACHINES
An unbiased by-county analysis of 2020 general election results of over 3000 U.S. counties shows large-scale skewing of election results in favor of Joe Biden in counties using Dominion Voting Systems.
Analysis conducted by DataScience and released through BASEDmedia constructed a statistical model to predict relative performance for either candidate based upon U.S. Census county data to 90% accuracy.
This analysis revealed that counties that used Dominion and Hart InterCivic ballot counting devices and software consistently gave a 5% vote advantage to candidate Joe Biden over President Trump. This advantage was observed regardless of the county’s majority political party affiliation nor urban, suburban, or rural area demographics.
For further information, the full report is available online here: Evidence of Potential Fraud in Counties Using Dominion Voting Machines (PDF)
