Tag: Philip Cunningham
-
Meanderings on Atheism, Darwinism, and Science
I am posting this excerpt of Daniel Dennett’s response to William Lane Craig’s presentation (HERE). Dennett’s short follow up offers no defense of his atheism in light of Craig’s presentation. He basically mentions that his non-knowledge will some day be filled in (atheism-of-the-gaps). This will be followed up by a response in the comments section that made…
-
Darwin vs. Population Genetics (Of Rabbits and Illusions)
Mind you, Philip Cunningham may be a bit tough to listen to… but his attention to detail — even if he cannot pronounce “intelligentsia” — are a must. Enjoy. (Above video description) “Darwinism provided an explanation for the appearance of design, and argued that there is no Designer — or, if you will, the designer is natural selection.…
-
Whale of a Tale ~ Debating Evolution
This post is with thanks to Philip Cunningham. One of the key (most complete) missing link in this WILD scenario is Rodhocetus. Rodhocetus’ discoverer, Dr. Phil Gingerich, one of the leading experts on whale evolution, promoted the idea that Rodhocetus had a whale’s fluke (tail) and flippers. Later Dr. Gingerich admitted, “Since then, we have found the…
-
Quantum Mechanics Meet Outdated Biological Models
The neo-Darwinian view of biology is being undermined by the emerging evidence in quantum mechanics (QM). Now, I do not accept the QM as many atheists do… however, the deterministic view of QM is giving theism a boost in an area atheists once thought they had a new foothold. One of my favorite critics of Darwin notes as much in…
-
Agent Causality vs. Blind Causality
[fbvideo link=”https://www.facebook.com/philip.cunningham.73/videos/1118356054843993/” width=”685″ height=”400″ onlyvideo=”0″]