Nothing To See Here… Dr. Craig

  • “But all there is to say about this, as far as I can see, is that Krauss is dead wrong and his religious and philosophical critics are absolutely right.”

~ [atheist] David Albert is a professor of philosophy at Columbia and the author of “Quantum Mechanics and Experience.” (NYT)

  • “I don’t know what’s the matter with physicists these days. It used to be that they were an intellectually sophisticated bunch, with the likes of Einstein and Bohr doing not only brilliant scientific research, but also interested, respectful of, and conversant in other branches of knowledge, particularly philosophy. These days it is much more likely to encounter physicists like Steven Weinberg or Stephen Hawking, who merrily go about dismissing philosophy for the wrong reasons, and quite obviously out of a combination of profound ignorance and hubris (the two often go together, as I’m sure Plato would happily point out). The latest such bore is Lawrence Krauss, of Arizona State University.”

~ [quoting atheist philosopher of science, Massimo Pigliucci] Peter S. Williams is Assistant Professor in Communication and Worldviews at Gimlekollen School of Journalism and Communication in Norway. He is author of many articles and several books, including “C.S. Lewis vs the New Atheists” & “A Faithful Guide to Philosophy” (Paternoster, 2013). (BETHINKING)

  • The quantum vacuum is the arena where fundamental physical processes take place, and is by no means a simple empty space where nothing ever happens or a pure abstract concept of quantum field theory. Many of these fundamental processes are nowadays well understood.

[atheist] Hartmut Figger and [atheist] Dieter Meschede, Laser Physics at the Limits (New York, NY: Springer Publishing, 2002), 197.

  • Even if the matter fields involved in the vacuum state are rather peculiar and certainly not observable in the sense that ‘real’ particles are, it is a mistake to think of any physical vacuum as some absolutely empty ‘void’.

[atheist] Christopher Ray, Time, Space and Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 1991), 205.

`Beyond the Big Bang` ~ one of the best lectures William Lane Craig (Serious Saturday)

From Video Description:

This is quite simply one of the best lectures William Lane Craig (a philosopher of science) has given. Craig explores the origins of the universe. He argues for a beginning of the universe, while refuting scientific models like the Steady State Theory, the Oscillating Theory, Quantum Vacuum Fluctuation Model, Chaotic Inflationary Theory, Quantum Gravity Theory, String Theory, M-Theory and Cyclic Ekpyrotic Theory.

Scientific Models in Parts:

Big Bang and Space-Time Model: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1Q6_y2J-H8

The Steady State Theory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMhC3Jl-UTs

The Oscillating Universe Theory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0y2KO0g6yc

Quantum Vacuum Fluctuation Model: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLctlZOIRZ4

Chaotic Inflationary Theory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAgLO5GFLQU

Quantum Gravity Theory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXbJ9mVE_Vo

String Theory, M-Theory and Cyclic Ekpyrotic Theory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MIfURwOrTU

Related video lectures on astrophysics and the beginning of the universe:

Did the Universe Have a Beginning? (Alexander Vilenkin): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXCQelhKJ7A

Modern Physics, the Beginning and Creation (Stephen M. Barr): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqUOFKOPKmE

The Beginning of the Universe and Fine-Tuning (Robert J. Spitzer and Bruce Gordon): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQcFstKzgaA