Philando Castile
The Philando Castile Verdict – Larry Elder
I intro this Larry Elder video a bit. Larry Elder touches on some of the cases legal issues, speaks to how comedians like Trevor Noah maligns and makes a mockery of facts. All and all a good body blow to the prevailing wisdom on the matter. Links to more, below.
FIRST, I believe Castile and his girlfriend were one of the robbers the police were looking for:
- Confirmed – Philando Castile Was an Armed Robbery Suspect – False Media Narrative Now Driving Cop Killings
- Higher Resolution Images Show Philando Castile Handgun at Scene of Shooting
- Shocker! It Looks Like the Media May Have Bought a False Narrative in Philando Castile Shooting
SECOND, the police officer saw him reaching, and if you listen close, his girlfriend, Lavish Reynolds, says “no” — seemingly telling Castile to stop what he was doing: “Police Dashcam Footage Of Philando Castile Fatal Shooting.” THIRD, Castile was REALLY high at the time of the shooting,
…A memo filed Wednesday says Castile was a regular marijuana user who died with high levels of THC, the drug’s chemical component, in his system. The memo says Castile was driving while stoned when St. Anthony Police Officer Jeronimo Yanez pulled him over, leading to their deadly encounter.
It says Castile, 32, was “culpably negligent and was the substantial cause of his own demise.”…
Which was probably why Castile did the following:
1) He didn’t make eye contact at all;
2) He did not follow the repeated instructions;
3) Didn’t say he had a conceal carry permit;
4) Didn’t keep his hands in view until further instructed by the officer.
(WashPo)
TWO DAYS PRIOR (July 4th), Philando Castile and his girlfriend are seen here parked, getting stoned, with their 4-year old in the back seat. The reason to note this is because his THC levels interrupted the routine taught him by the conceal-carry course once you announce having a gun.
Colion Noir on the Media and Philando Castile (UPDATE)
Anti-gun media outlets have made much of the NRA’s refusal to rush to judgment in the shooting death of Philando Castile to push the narrative that the organization “doesn’t care about black people.” Colion Noir fires back against that claim, pointing out that the NRA fights effectively for the constitutional rights of people of all races.
UPDATE:
Here is Philando Castile permit!
Larry Elder Sprinkles Some Kryptonite on Liberals
Here is LARRY ELDER layin’ down the SAGE LAW!
Where to start with actor Jesse Williams’ widely praised rant on police brutality and white racism delivered at this year’s Black Entertainment Television awards show?
To his enthusiastic audience, Williams reeled off lie after lie, all in the name of black “resistance” over the “oppressor” – meaning anyone he believes benefits from “this invention called whiteness.” Time magazine called his discourse “powerful.”
Where are fact-checkers when the fact-devoid desperately need fact-checking? After all, Williams practically begged to be fact-checked when he said, “What we’ve been doing is looking at the data, and we know that police somehow manage to de-escalate, disarm and not kill white people every day.”
The “police … manage to … not kill white people every day”?
Let’s start with 2014, the last year for which there are official records. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the police killed 261 whites and 131 blacks. The CDC also found that from 1999 to 2013, the police killed almost twice the number of whites compared to blacks, 3,160 and 1,724, respectively.
Activists promptly note that whites account for nearly 65 percent of the population and that, therefore, one would expect whites to comprise most of those killed by cops. And we are told that blacks, while 13 percent of the population, represent a much greater percentage of those killed by cops. Institutional, systemic, structural racism!
Here’s what those promoting the “police disproportionately kill black people” narrative consistently omit. Whites, despite being almost 65 percent of the population, disproportionately commit less of the nation’s violent crime – 10 percent. Blacks, at 13 percent of the population, disproportionately commit more violent crime. As to murders, black commit nearly half. Yet whites are 50 percent of cop killings.
Criminology professor Peter Moskos looked at the numbers of those killed by officers from May 2013 to April 2015 and found that 49 percent were white, while 30 percent were black. “Adjusted for the homicide rate,” says Moskos, “whites are 1.7 times more likely than blacks to die at the hands of police.” So if anything, whites have more to complain about than Mr. Williams….
Again we see a false narrative built by the media and then is comes collapsing down, via, THE AMERICAN SPECTATOR:
Here we go again.
Yet another hotly reported media narrative stamps itself on the national dialogue only to find — oops! — maybe there are actually more facts to be discovered before we know, as they say, “the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”
This time around the media narrative surrounds the Minnesota shooting by St. Anthony Village Police Department officer Jeronimo Yanez, the shooting victim one Philando Castile. Says a police audio tape of Yanez:
- “I’m going to check IDs. I have reason to pull it over. The two occupants just look like people that were involved in a robbery. The driver looks more like one of our suspects, just ’cause of the wide-set nose.”
Then we learn that there are pictures out there of the robber — one of two — committing the robbery, gun in hand. And indeed there is a similarity between one of the robbers and Castile.
Now. How did we learn any of this? From a narrative quite different from the mainstream media’s all-too-predictable “racist white cop kills black man” story — a different narrative that went viral over at CONSERVATIVE TREEHOUSE. The TreeHouse story drew instant wrath from liberal websites. Over at Mediaite John Ziegler PUT IT THIS WAY:
- Shocker! It Looks Like the Media May Have Bought a False Narrative in Philando Castile Shooting
Writes Ziegler in part:
If there is one thing I’ve learned about media firestorms in the modern age of one-hour news cycles and 15-second attention spans, it’s that whoever tells the first story which the news media likes is the “winner.” Once the narrative is set in stone (when the news media works in unison that takes about two days, tops), the truth will face a battle that is severely uphill, into the wind, on ice, and will almost never prevail.
There was no better example of this sad reality than the “Hands Up! Don’t Shoot!” myth which drove the entire Ferguson fiasco and was the origin of the entire “Black Lives Matter” movement. Every investigation into the matter (including by the Obama administration) later concluded, against self-interest, that this catchphrase was based on an obvious and despicable lie. However, even that did almost nothing to alter public perceptions of that event or the media’s eagerness to give instant credibility to similar claims from the same groups in the future.
Ziegler goes on at a later point to add:
Again, none of this remotely proves that Castile was indeed the armed robbery suspect. The point is that there is a potentially very compelling other side of this story which is being ignored or ridiculed by the media which is already very invested in the current narrative.
One of the best examples of this is the “fact check” website “Snopes,” which, in its typically arrogant and liberal fashion, has definitely declared these “rumors” about Castile to be “false,” while actually doing a pretty good job of establishing that they might actually be true (while also ignoring the significance of what we now know was in the police officer’s mindset). A close reading of their conclusions could best be summed up by saying: “We want this story to be false, so, because it hasn’t yet been proven 100% true by liberal media sources with no incentive to do so, it must be false.”
I have seen many times the power of what happens to media coverage once every new fact is seen through the prism of a false narrative and is impacted by a clear confirmation bias. Everything is then perceived completely differently than it should be, sometimes laughably so….
Exactly so….