Obama Scandals
Who Is IRS Commissioner Steven Miller Protecting?
IRS HID PROBE UNTIL AFTER ELECTION ~ Memory Issues of IRS Chief Steven Miller (Paul Ryan Added)
Via Weekly Standard:
Report: IRS Deliberately Chose Not to Fess Up to Scandal Before Election: “[I]f this fact came out in September 2012, in the middle of a presidential election? The terrain would have looked very different.”
Via Gateway Pundit:
IRS Chief Steven Miller told Rep. Dave Reichert at the House Ways and Means Committee hearing this morning that he can’t remember who was responsible at the IRS for targeting conservatives.
Paul Ryan gets Commissioner to admit the words “progressive” (and other liberal keywords/descriptors) was not used.
Definition of `Rogue; Off the Reservation` = Doing What Bosses Told Them to Do
These “rogue” employees were getting info in 2012… the act had been happening since 2010 and the IRS has admitted to knowing about it in 2011. So how can these guys/gals be “off the reservation” in 2012? Breitbart:
FOX 19 is reporting that four Cincinnati workers have been identified for disciplinary and possible criminal action for targeting “right wing” groups applying to the IRS for non-profit status. However, according to sources, IRS workers in Cincinnati, OH “simply did what their bosses ordered.”
Yesterday, Acting IRS Commissioner Steve Miller described two Cincinnati workers as “rogue” and “off the reservation.” But two sources tell the news outlet that there are four workers “pin-pointed” by the IRS, as opposed to only two as mentioned by Miller.
Fox19 has confirmed that the four employees in question made unusual requests for information from:
1. The Richmond, Virginia Tea Party in January of 2012.
2. The Ohio Liberty Council in January of 2012..
3. Dan Backer, a lawyer based in Washington D.C. who helped six small conservative groups apply for 501c4 status in February of 2012.
4. The Liberty Township Tea Party in March of 2012.
Via Gateway Pundit:
Four Cincinnati IRS employees not two were involved in targeting conservative and Christian groups. The employees said they “simply did what our bosses ordered.”
HotAir has the YouTube:
`A Lie, is a Lie, is a Lie!` ~ Judge Jeanine Pirro
Judge Jeanine Pirro, who attended this week’s Congressional hearing on Benghazi, says the testimony she witnessed proved President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are liars.
Tea Party Leader: When IRS Asked For Copies of Speeches & Names of Employers We Withdrew Our Application
Criminal! Peter Riehm, chairman of the Common Sense CampaignIRS, a conservative group was on with Neil Cavuto today. Riehm told Neal they withdrew their application after months and months of harassment.
Some Drudge headlines:
- IRS ASKED FOR FACEBOOK POSTS, READING LISTS, PRIVATE THOUGHTS...
- Number of targeted groups swells to 500...
- CLAIM: OBAMA CAMPAIGN CO-CHAIR ATTACKED ROMNEY WITH LEAKED DOCS...
- IRS approved liberal groups while Tea Party in limbo...
- 'Thin' IG report only skims surface...
- GOP Rep: Impeachment Not 'Off The Table'...
- Prominent Catholic Prof. Claims Audited Her After Speaking Out Against Obama...
- Demanded to Know Who Was Paying Her...
- IRS Employees Donate Disproportionately to Obama...
- Rubio: 'These Are The Tactics Of The Third World'...
- Committee Chairman: 'Yes,' I Was Lied to...
Jon Stewart blasts Obama on IRS scandal
Party Affiliation vs. Ideals/Ethics
`I Was Going to Start Off Tonight With an Obama Joke But I Don’t Want to Get Audited by the I.R.S.` ~ Leno
ABC`s Trey Hardin Drops a Bomb on The Doug McIntyre Show (790 KABC) about the IRS Scandal
Four Pinocchio`s from WaPo: `I Called It Terror` (Kirsten Powers: They Are Lies!)
The Pinocchio Test
During the campaign, the president could just get away with claiming he said “act of terror,” since he did use those words — though not in the way he often claimed. It seemed like a bit of after-the-fact spin, but those were his actual words — to the surprise of Mitt Romney in the debate.
But the president’s claim that he said “act of terrorism” is taking revisionist history too far, given that he repeatedly refused to commit to that phrase when asked directly by reporters in the weeks after the attack. He appears to have gone out of his way to avoid saying it was a terrorist attack, so he has little standing to make that claim now.
Indeed, the initial unedited talking points did not call it an act of terrorism. Instead of pretending the right words were uttered, it would be far better to acknowledge that he was echoing what the intelligence community believed at the time–and that the administration’s phrasing could have been clearer and more forthright from the start.