RPT’s Description:
Watch Marc Morano SLAM DUNK Carol Andress (Director of Legislative Operations for the Environmental Defense Fund). She ~apparently~ has never heard arguments against her positions… because at one part her “erhs” and “uhs” (I, the, yeh, uhh…) was embarrassing.
The job of those of us are easy because the Left typically “labels” those who disagree with them “skeptics,” or “deniers” (or: sexist, intolerant, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist, bigoted), so they never entertain the idea of hearing these arguments.
(Well-thought-out — reasonable/reasoned challenges… and they are shocked, yes shocked, when we backwoods/backwards Republicans can come up with them. And, so, they become flummoxed.) In this case, she had never heard about Hurricanes be at a record low.
- SEE: “2a” and “2b”
And so they will not respond or investigate these claims they blindly adhere to… what will happen is as they get more sway over the growing government they will legally shut people up BY the force of the state. Making freedom [and good science… one that is not politically driven but asks all the questions available to them] a thing of the past.
Religious freedom, freedom to question science, 1st Amendment freedoms… all onslaughts on the Constitution from the Democratic Left.
From Climate Depot:
Heartland Institute reviews debate:
- ‘Morano brought the facts — relentlessly and firmly. Andress was criminally uninformed for someone in her position. She spent so much time stammering, everyone who is a part of EDF or supports it should be embarrassed.’
Morano:
- ‘The UN would like you to think there is no debate. The IPCC is a political body masquerading as a science body. And the points EDF’s Carol Andress just made are demonstrably not true…On climate timescales of 50-100 [extreme weather] is either falling short of predictions or going in the opposite direction.’
Morano:
- ‘Climate is governed by hundreds of factors…CO2 is not the control knob of the climate. That is where the debate is and the idea that it is settled is absurd. There are so many scientists dissenting.’ – The UN IPCC has an agenda. They openly say they want to redistribute wealth by climate policy. So they are using the science as a partisan political campaign effort for centralized government planning through the United Nations. It’s a self enrichment tool, self-interest tool and a way they can be in charge of the developing world’s development.’